de Trevino v. Trevino

63 Tex. 650, 1885 Tex. LEXIS 143
Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 1885·No. Case No. 1920·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Delany, J. Com. App.

The real object of this suit is to compel a husband to support a wife whom he has abandoned, and who is not seeking a divorce. If the plaintiff were suing for divorce her remedy would be complete. R. S., arts. 2860-2870. Or if she owned real estate, and her husband were improperly appropriating the revenues, she would have a somewhat restricted remedy; but not in the district court. R. S., art. 2856. But in the present case the wife appears to have no remedy—at least in this form of action.

We think, therefore, that the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed,

[Opinion adopted March 27, 1885.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

de Trevino v. Trevino, 63 Tex. 650, 1885 Tex. LEXIS 143 (Tex. 1885).

63 Tex. 650 (de Trevino v. Trevino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rader v. Rader
378 S.W.2d 373 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Cohen v. Cohen
181 S.W.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Martin v. Martin
17 S.W.2d 789 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1929)
Martin v. Martin
9 S.W.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Gonzales v. Gonzales
300 S.W. 20 (Texas Supreme Court, 1927)
Gowin v. Gowin
264 S.W. 529 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Turner v. Turner
204 S.W. 133 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Dority v. Dority
60 L.R.A. 941 (Texas Supreme Court, 1903)
In re Dole
14 Haw. 554 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1903)