De Taslet v. Crousellat

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

De Taslet v. Crousellat

7 F. Cas. 542, 1 Wash. C. C. 504

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 F. Cas. 542 (De Taslet v. Crousellat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Taslet v. Crousellat, 7 F. Cas. 542, 1 Wash. C. C. 504 (circtdpa 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The foundation of this offset is a breach of contract which makes the merchant who thus neglects to insure, the insurer, and he is liable as the insurer, and is entitled to make the defence which the insurer could make. This, therefore, is not a case of unliquidated damages. As to the second point, that was settled in the case of Armstrong v. Brown [Case No. 542], The parties then agreed to withdraw a juror, the plaintiff not being prepared to meet the first offset.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The foundation of this offset is a breach of contract which makes the merchant who thus neglects to insure, the insurer, and he is liable as the insurer, and is entitled to make the defence which the insurer could make. This, therefore, is not a case of unliquidated damages. As to the second point, that was settled in the case of Armstrong v. Brown [Case No. 542], The parties then agreed to withdraw a juror, the plaintiff not being prepared to meet the first offset.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 542, 1 Wash. C. C. 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-taslet-v-crousellat-circtdpa-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack