De St. Aubin v. King

209 Ill. App. 419, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 643
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 30, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,242
StatusPublished

This text of 209 Ill. App. 419 (De St. Aubin v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De St. Aubin v. King, 209 Ill. App. 419, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 643 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Injunction, § 296*—what damages awarded on dissolution of against foreclosure sale. Where the sale of property on foreclosure is enjoined, damages on the dissolution of the injunction should be computed according to the injury actually sustained, and consideration may be given to the proper amount .which might have been realized if the sale had not been enjoined, the value of money at the time and such other circumstances as tend to show the actual injury sustained. 3. Injunction, § 381*-—what need not he shown hy record on appeal from decree awarding damages on dissolution of. On appeal from a decree awarding damages on the dissolution of an injunction, it is not necessary that it appear from the record that the defendant paid or became liable to pay the amount allowed as solicitor’s fees or that the amount allowed was the usual and customary charge for the services rendered. It is sufficient if it appear that the amount allowed was reasonable and fair, in view of the services rendered. 4. Attorney and client, § 52*—what constitutes prima facie showing of employment of attorney. Where the record on appeal from a decree awarding damages on the dissolution of a temporary injunction discloses that a certain attorney appeared for defendant, argued the motion to dissolve in his behalf and that the motion was granted, there is a prima facie showing that the attorney was employed by defendant. 5. Attorney and client, § 52*—when presumed attorney properly employed. Where there is prima facie proof that an attorney was employed by a party, defendant in proceedings for dissolution of temporary injunction, it will be presumed that he was properly employed until the contrary is shown. 6. Injunction, § 321*—solicitor’s fees for procuring dissolution of temporary. An award of a solicitor’s fee of $250 for services in procuring the dissolution of a temporary injunction, held reasonable and fair. 7. Injunction, § 296*—cost of advertising foreclosure sale as damages upon dissolution of. On awarding damages on the dissolution of a temporary injunction against a foreclosure sale, it is proper to include the cost of advertising the original sale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 419, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-st-aubin-v-king-illappct-1918.