De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
Docket17-100
StatusUnpublished

This text of De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * EUGENIO PAULO DE SOUZA, * * No. 17-100V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: January 26, 2018 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”); * acute demyelinating polyneuropathy * Respondent. * ******************** *

Carol L. Gallagher, Linwood, NJ, for Petitioner; Voris E. Johnson, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On January 24, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Eugenio Paulo De Souza on January 23, 2017. Petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on September 15, 2014, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome/ acute demyelinating polyneuropathy. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that petitioner's current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 17-100V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) EUGENIO PAULO DE SOUZA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 17-100V (ECF) v. ) Special Master Moran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Eugenio Paulo de Souza (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the

“Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries sustained following

petitioner’s receipt of an influenza vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury

Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received an influenza vaccine on September 15, 2014.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he subsequently suffered the injury Guillain-Barré

Syndrome (“GBS”)/acute demyelinating polyneuropathy, which petitioner alleges was caused-

in-fact by his receipt of the influenza vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the

residual effects of his injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages as a result of his condition. 6. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged injury

and residual effects, or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Eugenio Paulo de Souza. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396

et seq.), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

2 paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject

to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for the

award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
De Souza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-souza-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2018.