de Santos v. Clark Bros. Pan American, Inc.
This text of 12 A.D.2d 925 (de Santos v. Clark Bros. Pan American, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered on September 6, 1960, denying defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to section 180 of the Civil Practice Act, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion granted, with $10 costs unless service is effected on defendant Bozo within 60 days from the entry of the order herein. The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s coventurer is an indispensable party and therefore plaintiff is precluded from urging otherwise at this time. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 925, 211 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-santos-v-clark-bros-pan-american-inc-nyappdiv-1961.