De Sairigne v. Gould

177 F.2d 515
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 1949
Docket28, Docket 21384
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 177 F.2d 515 (De Sairigne v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Sairigne v. Gould, 177 F.2d 515 (2d Cir. 1949).

Opinion

177 F.2d 515 (1949)

Anne Vilbert DE SAIRIGNE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank Jay GOULD, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 28, Docket 21384.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 4, 1949.
Decided November 4, 1949.

Samuel N. Leiterman, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Cahill, Gordon, Zachry & Reindel, Roberts, Austin, Muller & McCook, New York City (Mathias F. Correa, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, 83 F.Supp. 270, in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murty v. Aga Khan
92 F.R.D. 478 (E.D. New York, 1981)
Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
78 F.R.D. 445 (D. Delaware, 1978)
Farmanfarmaian v. Gulf Oil Corp.
437 F. Supp. 910 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Spencer v. Alcoa Steamship Company
221 F. Supp. 343 (E.D. New York, 1963)
Catapodis v. Onassis
2 Misc. 2d 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-sairigne-v-gould-ca2-1949.