De Rubin v. United States
Opinion
Plaintiffs, citizens and residents of the Philippines, sue to recover the value of supplies and money requisitioned by recognized guerrilla units and by the Philippine Army units during the period of the Japanese occupation of the Philippines.
Plaintiffs’ petitions were filed in this, court on December 30, 1952 and defendant has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the claims are barred by the [669]*669statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2501, because the petition was not filed within six years of September 2, 1945, 59 Stat. 1733. Marcos v. United States, 102 F.Supp. 547, 122 Ct.Cl. 641.
Plaintiffs contend that their causes of action did not accrue until defendant, by command of General MacArthur, assumed the obligation of paying such, claims and until the agency (Army Claims Service) designated for the purpose of considering and settling the claims had been established.
AH of the arguments urged by plaintiffs herein were considered and disposed of adversely to plaintiffs’ position in our decision this day issued in the case of Sese v. United States, Ct.Cl., 113 F.Supp. 658. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ petitions are dismissed.
■It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
113 F. Supp. 668 (De Rubin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.