De Rose v. De Rose

1 Hopk. Ch. 100
New York Court of Chancery·Decided March 23, 1824·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court.

No costs are allowed in this case. In the converse case of a bill by the wife, against the husband, costs may be allowed. But where the wife is defendant, she is presumed to be left destitute of means to pay costs ; and it seems cruel to give them against her, though the offending party. If it appeared that she had separate property, the case might be different.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Rose v. De Rose, 1 Hopk. Ch. 100 (N.Y. 1824).

1 Hopk. Ch. 100 (De Rose v. De Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Johnson
83 N.W. 291 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)