De Rosa v. Pace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Rosa v. Pace

22 A.D.2d 817, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 817 (De Rosa v. Pace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Rosa v. Pace, 22 A.D.2d 817, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services and medical expenses, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 18, 1963, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J. and Kleinfeld, J., dissent, and vote to reverse the order and to grant the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the undisputed facts raise an inescapable inference of negligence on the defendant’s part (Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381; Stone v. Goldsmith, 18 A D 2d 913; Savitt v. Leeds, 18 A D 2d 913).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services and medical expenses, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 18, 1963, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J. and Kleinfeld, J., dissent, and vote to reverse the order and to grant the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the undisputed facts raise an inescapable inference of negligence on the defendant’s part (Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381; Stone v. Goldsmith, 18 A D 2d 913; Savitt v. Leeds, 18 A D 2d 913).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 817, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-rosa-v-pace-nyappdiv-1964.