De Roode-Wentz, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gomez)
This text of De Roode-Wentz, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gomez) (De Roode-Wentz, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gomez)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CAROLIEN DE ROODE-WENTZ, M.D.; No. 80299 AND CHILDREN'S BONE & SPINE SURGERY, LLC, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JAN 0 3 2020 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELVABEN A. BROWN CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT TIERRA DANIELLE JONES, DISTRICT DEPUTY CLERK JUDGE, Respondents, and JONATHAN GOMEZ, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying petitioners inotion to continue trial and to take a trial deposition. Petitioners have also filed an emergency motion to stay trial pending our consideration of this petition, and real party in interest has filed an opposition. Having reviewed the parties' arguments and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. See Inel Garne Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist: Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of a legally required act or to control a manifest abuse of or an arbitrary or capricious exercise of disdretion). The district court carefully considered and weighed the competing interests underlying this matter, which is reaching the 5-year mark, and real party
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 40S94, - was in interest has offered to take a trial deposition before trial begins on Monday, or thereafter. Therefore, based on the information before us, we discern no manifest abuse of discretion so as to warrant our intervention, and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
C.J.
/11,43a,..0 J. Stiglich
J. Silver
cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge CoHinson, Daehnke, Inlow & Greco Vannah & Vannah Eighth District Court Clerk
In light of this order, petitioners emergency stay motion is denied as moot. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2 10) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
De Roode-Wentz, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Gomez), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-roode-wentz-md-vs-dist-ct-gomez-nev-2020.