De Rogatis v. Megaro

106 A. 890, 89 N.J. Eq. 588, 4 Stock. 588, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 353
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 1918·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Rogatis v. Megaro, 106 A. 890, 89 N.J. Eq. 588, 4 Stock. 588, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 353 (N.J. 1918).

106 A. 890 (De Rogatis v. Megaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.