De Ridder v. Gerard
This text of 117 N.E. 1065 (De Ridder v. Gerard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered as follows: Second question in the negative so far as concerns the cause of action to recover damages on account of stock purchased in open market, and in affirmative so far as concerns cause' of action based on. subscription agreement; third question in the affirmative; first question not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Pound, M cLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: Hogan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 N.E. 1065, 221 N.Y. 665, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-ridder-v-gerard-ny-1917.