De Ridder v. Gerard
117 N.E. 1065, 221 N.Y. 665, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1535
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered as follows: Second question in the negative so far as concerns the cause of action to recover damages on account of stock purchased in open market, and in affirmative so far as concerns cause' of action based on. subscription agreement; third question in the affirmative; first question not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Pound, M cLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: Hogan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Ridder v. Gerard, 117 N.E. 1065, 221 N.Y. 665, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1535 (N.Y. 1917).
117 N.E. 1065 (De Ridder v. Gerard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Credit Suisse Sec.
31 N.Y.3d 622 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
Finkel v. D.H. Blair & Co.
213 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
State v. Bronxville Glen I Associates
174 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & Ernst
106 S.W.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)