De Raismes v. Cahill
117 A. 30, 97 N.J.L. 565, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 239
This text of 117 A. 30 (De Raismes v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
De Raismes v. Cahill, 117 A. 30, 97 N.J.L. 565, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1922).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — ’The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenraci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nugent v. Hayes
120 A. 38 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 A. 30, 97 N.J.L. 565, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-raismes-v-cahill-nj-1922.