De Poorter v. Haydel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

De Poorter v. Haydel

7 Teiss. 107

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 29, 1909

DocketNo. 4870

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Teiss. 107 (De Poorter v. Haydel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Poorter v. Haydel, 7 Teiss. 107 (La. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinions

DUFOUR, J.

A motion to dismiss this devolutive appeal is made on the ground that the bond is defective, because it does not set forth in substance that it is given as surety that the appellant herein will prosecute his appeal and satisfy whatever judgment should be rendered against him.

Without expressing any view as to the merits of the contention, we must decline to consider the motion as made too late.

A motion based on any informality or irregularity of the bond should be made within three days after the record is filed in this court.

The appeal was returnable and was filed on September 7th, and the motion was not filed until October 25th.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUFOUR, J.

A motion to dismiss this devolutive appeal is made on the ground that the bond is defective, because it does not set forth in substance that it is given as surety that the appellant herein will prosecute his appeal and satisfy whatever judgment should be rendered against him.

Without expressing any view as to the merits of the contention, we must decline to consider the motion as made too late.

A motion based on any informality or irregularity of the bond should be made within three days after the record is filed in this court.

The appeal was returnable and was filed on September 7th, and the motion was not filed until October 25th.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Teiss. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-poorter-v-haydel-lactapp-1909.