De Peyster v. Gardner

New York Supreme Court

De Peyster v. Gardner

1 Cai. Cas. 492

DecidedNovember 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 492 (De Peyster v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Peyster v. Gardner, 1 Cai. Cas. 492 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam delivered by Livingfton, J.

The affured in this policy has, certainly, made out a cafe of more favor, than the one we have juft difpofed of. For he was not owner, but only matter of the Polly, and, therefore, could not refufe to take the goods of Stanibury ; nor had his intereft, or agency, any influence on the confifcation. The judgment of the court below mutt, therefore, be affirmed with double cotts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam delivered by Livingfton, J.

The affured in this policy has, certainly, made out a cafe of more favor, than the one we have juft difpofed of. For he was not owner, but only matter of the Polly, and, therefore, could not refufe to take the goods of Stanibury ; nor had his intereft, or agency, any influence on the confifcation. The judgment of the court below mutt, therefore, be affirmed with double cotts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cai. Cas. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-peyster-v-gardner-nysupct-1803.