De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co.
133 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 714, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 230
Opinion
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co., 133 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 714, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 230 (N.J. 1926).
133 A. 919 (De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roper v. Blumenfeld
706 A.2d 1151 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
Fagan v. City of Newark
188 A.2d 427 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
Wadell v. Public Service Coordinated Transport
65 A.2d 766 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)