De Oliveira v. VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, L.L.C.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 12, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-01754
StatusUnknown

This text of De Oliveira v. VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, L.L.C. (De Oliveira v. VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Oliveira v. VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, L.L.C., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

OMY ULI:

CAUSE # DANIEL DE OLIVEIRA,MD § _ PLAINTIFF § UNITED STATES DISTRICT V. § . COURT § VHS HARLINGEN HOSPITAL § COMPANY, LLC, D.B.A. § SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL § CENTER-HARLINGEN — § TENET HEALTHCARE § NEW YORK . DEFENDANTS § PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ADMISSIONS UNDER RULE 36 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Sunday, March 2, 2025 .

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Dr. Daniel De Oliveira, pro se, and respectfully submits this Motion for Admissions under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff requests that Defendants VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, D.B.A. Valley Baptist Medical Center-Harlingen, and Tenet Healthcare respond to the following admissions in accordance with Rule 36(a)(1), which allows a party to serve upon any other party a written request for the admission of the truth of matters within the scope of discovery.

I, LEGAL STANDARD

1, Under Rule 36(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may

serve a written request to admit the truth of matters relating to:

a) Facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; and

b) The genuineness of any described documents.

2. The purpose of Rule 36 is to narrow the issues for trial, eliminate the

necessity of proving undisputed facts, and facilitate the efficient administration of justice.

3, Pursuant to Rule 36(a)(3), a matter is deemed admitted unless the

responding party serves a written answer or objection within 30 days.

4, Defendants must provide specific denials or detailed explanations why they cannot truthfully admit or deny any request, as required by Rule

36(a)(4).

Il. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS

Plaintiff requests that Defendants admit or deny the following:

Admit or Deny - Arbitration Clause and Jurisdiction

1. Admit or Deny that the Relocation Agreement contained a binding

arbitration clause that removes subject matter jurisdiction from

Cameron County Court at Law 1.

2. Admit or Deny that the arbitration clause is irrevocable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and that neither VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, its legal team, Daniel De Oliveira, MD, his legal team, nor the court had the power to revoke the irrevocable arbitration clause under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

3. Admit or Deny that VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, filed a lawsuit against Dr. Daniel De Oliveira while omitting the arbitration clause, misleading the court into believing it had jurisdiction.

4. Admit or Deny that under federal precedent and the Federal Arbitration Act, Cameron County Court at Law | never had and does not have jurisdiction over Dr. Daniel De Oliveira due to the arbitration clause.

5. Admit or Deny that Valley Baptist Medical Center's omission of the arbitration clause constitutes fraud upon the court.

Admit or Deny - Forfeiture of Arbitration by Litigation

6. Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Company, LLC breached the contract by litigating.

7. Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Company, LLC is a Tenet Healthcare subsidiary and Tenet Healthcare is responsible for its actions.

8. Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Company, LLC had an actual arbitration clause in the contract.

9, Admit or Deny that no payments were made to Dr. Daniel De Oliveira in his individual capacity, thereby fulfilling his obligations under the contract.

□□□ Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Company, LLC failed to initiate arbitration as required by the contract and instead pursued litigation for over five years, violating the terms of the agreement.

11.Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Company, LLC filed for arbitration in 2024, far beyond the statute of limitations, after previously litigating for over five years, despite the fact that one cannot file for arbitration if a valid

contract did not exist in 2024.

12.Admit or Deny that the contract in question was signed in 2014, the alleged breach occurred in 2016, and the statute of limitations for both expired in

2020, meaning that in 2024 there was no valid contract for JAMS to derive jurisdiction to arbitrate.

13.Admit or Deny that by initiating litigation instead of arbitration, VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, waived its right to arbitration, per the precedent Perry Homes v. Cull, 258 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. 2008).

14,Admit or Deny that VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, is attempting to arbitrate a dispute six years after the alleged breach of contract and cight years after the contract expired.

15.Admit or Deny that VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC’s arbitration with JAMS is time-barred under applicable statutes and legal precedent.

16.Admit or Deny that Texas Supreme Court precedent establishes that when a party chooses litigation over arbitration, it forfeits arbitration rights.

17.Admit or Deny that VHS Hospital Tenet committed fraud upon the court by claiming dominant jurisdiction in the 192nd District Court on case CAUSE # DC-24-17325 to transfer the case to Cameron County Court at Law 1, despite Cameron County Court at Law 1 lacking jurisdiction over Dr. Daniel De Oliveira.

18.Admit or Deny that Valley Baptist Hospital Tenet committed fraud upon the court by claiming dominant jurisdiction to transfer the case from the 113th District Court to Cameron County Court at Law 1, where a non- existent case was illegally created by Cameron County Court at Law 1.

19.Admit or Deny that VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, D.B.A. Valley Baptist Medical Center-Harlingen and Valley Baptist Realty

Company, LLC incorrectly consolidated Cause No. 2018-CCL-01401 in violation of the arbitration clause.

20.Admit or Deny that the arbitration clause does not allow case consolidation between VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC and Valley Baptist Realty Company, LLC.

21.Admit or Deny that the arbitration clause removed subject matter jurisdiction from Cameron County Court at Law 1.

22.Admit or Deny that Cameron County Court at Law I had no jurisdiction to consolidate cases involving VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, and Valley Baptist Realty Company, LLC.

HI. CONCLUSION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court order Defendants VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, LLC, D.B.A. Valley Baptist Medical Center-Harlingen, and Tenet Healthcare to respond to these Requests for Admissions within the time required under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff further prays for any such relief the Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Dasfiel De Oliveira, M.D. Pro Se Plaintiff 374 East Meadow Av., Apt C East Meadow, NY 11554 Phone: (979) 373-4933 Email: danieldeoliveira@me.com

APPLICATION DENIED, SO ORDERED 1 jo poe” AU VERNON S. BRODERICK US.DJ.

Date: March 12, 2025 This case has not proceeded to the discovery phase, which is the prop stage for such requests for admissions to be served. Defendants have not yet been served with the initial pleadings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Orde to pro se Plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry Homes v. Cull
258 S.W.3d 580 (Texas Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
De Oliveira v. VHS Harlingen Hospital Company, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-oliveira-v-vhs-harlingen-hospital-company-llc-nysd-2025.