De Oliveira v. Holder

585 F. App'x 188
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2014·No. No. 14-1373·Published

Opinion

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cleide de Oliveira, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and de Oliveira’s claims and conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(D) (2012); Sorcia v. Holder, 643 F.3d 117, 124-25 (4th Cir.2011); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we grant the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Oliveira v. Holder, 585 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2014).

585 F. App'x 188 (De Oliveira v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sorcia v. Holder
643 F.3d 117 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Mosere v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)