De Oliveira v. Holder
This text of 585 F. App'x 188 (De Oliveira v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cleide de Oliveira, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and de Oliveira’s claims and conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(D) (2012); Sorcia v. Holder, 643 F.3d 117, 124-25 (4th Cir.2011); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we grant the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-oliveira-v-holder-ca4-2014.