De Nicola v. Pallas

82 Misc. 2d 156, 368 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2588
CourtUtica City Court
DecidedMay 23, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 Misc. 2d 156 (De Nicola v. Pallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utica City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Nicola v. Pallas, 82 Misc. 2d 156, 368 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2588 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

Jack J. Danella, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff to vacate judgment for costs in favor of defendant after a jury trial. The action was originally commenced by plaintiff in Small Claims Court. Defendant demanded a jury trial pursuant to section 1806 of the Uniform City Court Act. This did not change the basic character of the action as a small claims matter.

In Small Claims Court no statutory costs are allowable to either party. (Rules for Small Claims, City Court of Utica, § 3525.10; 22 NYCRR 3525.10.) This is in keeping with the legislative intent behind the establishment of small claims parts in local city courts which is to provide a forum for the enforcing of "Small Claims” by a quick, inexpensive, simplified and informal procedure where individual parties may appear without attorneys (UCCA, § 1802).

By commencing an action in Small Claims Court, a party waives his right to a jury trial (UCCA, § 1806). To have deprived the defendant of such a right, might have been in violation of his constitutional rights. (NY Const, art 1, § 2.) However, in an effort to discourage defendants from transferring cases from Small Claims Court to Jury Trial Terms, the Legislature imposed certain burdens upon such defendants [157]*157such as the requirement for posting of security costs and the awarding of discretionary costs to successful plaintiffs. There is no similar provision for successful defendants. (UCCA, § 1806.) These are not additional costs for a successful plaintiff. (Dolin v Eck, 61 Misc 2d 549.)

Under such circumstances, the defendant is not entitled to costs. (UCCA, § 1902, subd [c].) Plaintiff’s motion granted without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albert v. City of New York
101 Misc. 2d 356 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1979)
MacCollam v. Arlington
94 Misc. 2d 692 (Albany City Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Misc. 2d 156, 368 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-nicola-v-pallas-nyuticacityct-1975.