De Negres v. De Negres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Negres v. De Negres

54 A.D.2d 964, 388 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 964 (De Negres v. De Negres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Negres v. De Negres, 54 A.D.2d 964, 388 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered February 19, 1976, which, after a hearing, (1) granted the petitioner wife’s application to enforce the provisions for child support contained in a judgment of divorce and (2) denied his application for a downward modification of the said child support provisions. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings in accordance herewith. It appeared at the hearing that the husband’s present income was too low to justify the support provisions contained in the judgment of divorce. However, the husband, who appeared pro se, was unprepared to prove a change in circumstances. On the record herein, he should be given the opportunity to present such proof at a new hearing. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered February 19, 1976, which, after a hearing, (1) granted the petitioner wife’s application to enforce the provisions for child support contained in a judgment of divorce and (2) denied his application for a downward modification of the said child support provisions. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings in accordance herewith. It appeared at the hearing that the husband’s present income was too low to justify the support provisions contained in the judgment of divorce. However, the husband, who appeared pro se, was unprepared to prove a change in circumstances. On the record herein, he should be given the opportunity to present such proof at a new hearing. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 964, 388 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-negres-v-de-negres-nyappdiv-1976.