De Natale v. De Natale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Natale v. De Natale

1 A.D.2d 1029, 152 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5289

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 1029 (De Natale v. De Natale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Natale v. De Natale, 1 A.D.2d 1029, 152 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order insofar as it grants respondent a counsel fee in connection with a motion to punish appellant for contempt and a counsel fee to defend an appeal from a judgment of separation. Order modified by (1) striking from the third ordering paragraph the figure “ $2,500.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “$1,500.00”, and (2) striking from the fourth ordering paragraph the second figure “ $1,375.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “ $375. ” As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In our opionion, the counsel fee to defend the appeal is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order insofar as it grants respondent a counsel fee in connection with a motion to punish appellant for contempt and a counsel fee to defend an appeal from a judgment of separation. Order modified by (1) striking from the third ordering paragraph the figure “ $2,500.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “$1,500.00”, and (2) striking from the fourth ordering paragraph the second figure “ $1,375.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “ $375. ” As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In our opionion, the counsel fee to defend the appeal is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 1029, 152 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-natale-v-de-natale-nyappdiv-1956.