De Moya v. Moriarty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

De Moya v. Moriarty

584 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9325, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2358

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1991

DocketNo. 91-1093

StatusPublished

This text of 584 So. 2d 654 (De Moya v. Moriarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Moya v. Moriarty, 584 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9325, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We dismiss this petition for certiorari-mandamus-prohibition for two reasons. First, it seeks review of an order entered more than 30 days before it was filed. Second, whether it be deemed certiorari or mandamus or prohibition, we think the order should await review, if at all, only after [655]*655the entry of a final order disposing of the case.

PETITION DISMISSED.

HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, Judge.

We dismiss this petition for certiorari-mandamus-prohibition for two reasons. First, it seeks review of an order entered more than 30 days before it was filed. Second, whether it be deemed certiorari or mandamus or prohibition, we think the order should await review, if at all, only after [655]*655the entry of a final order disposing of the case.

PETITION DISMISSED.

HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

584 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9325, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-moya-v-moriarty-fladistctapp-1991.