De Mott v. Laraway

14 Wend. 225
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 14 Wend. 225 (De Mott v. Laraway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Mott v. Laraway, 14 Wend. 225 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The court of common pleas erred in reversing the judgment of the justice. Laraway was a common carrier upon the canal, and as such undertook to transport the defendant’s goods from Troy to Kidder's ferry. This necessarily included the duty.of delivering the goods there in safety. They were all thus delivered except a hogshead of molasses, which was stove, in the act of being unladen; as they were hoisting it from the boat, with a tackle attached to a store house upon the bank of the canal, the rope broke, and the hogshead fell into the boat, and most of the molasses was lost. Although one of the defendants was present, there is no pretence that he had accepted the molasses as delivered, previously to the accident,or that he had any thing to do with the delivery. The delivery was not complete when the accident occurred, and the goods were still at the risk of the carrier. It is a matter of no importance that the machinery employed in unlading the boat was attached to and belonged to a store on the bank of the canal, and not to the carrier’s boat. It was pm hac vice his tackle, and he was responsible for its sufficiency. When the responsibility of a common carrier has begun, it continues until there has been a due delivery by him.. 4 Kent's Comm. 604. 4 T. R. 581. 5 id. 389.

The objection of the defendant in error, that the claim of the defendants for the injury sustained by them, was not a proper subject of set-off, is disposed of by the stipulation of the parties that the whole matter should be submitted to the justice.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.
27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 39 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Rawson v. . Holland
59 N.Y. 611 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Morehead
5 W. Va. 293 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1872)
Burtis v. . the Buffalo and State Line Railroad Company
24 N.Y. 269 (New York Court of Appeals, 1862)
The R. G. Winslow
20 F. Cas. 628 (D. Wisconsin, 1860)
The New Brunswick Steamboat v. Tiers
24 N.J.L. 697 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Wend. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-mott-v-laraway-nysupct-1835.