De Mott Homes at Salem, Inc. v. City of Margate City
57 A.2d 388, 136 N.J.L. 639, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Mott Homes at Salem, Inc. v. City of Margate City, 57 A.2d 388, 136 N.J.L. 639, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1948).
57 A.2d 388 (De Mott Homes at Salem, Inc. v. City of Margate City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel
456 A.2d 390 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Gruber v. Raritan Tp.
172 A.2d 47 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Beach v. Planning & Zoning Commission
103 A.2d 814 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1954)
Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON
94 A.2d 660 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Guaclides v. Englewood Cliffs
78 A.2d 435 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Tp. of Wayne
74 A.2d 609 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)