De Millen v. McAlilley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

De Millen v. McAlilley

27 S.C.L. 499

DecidedJuly 1, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 27 S.C.L. 499 (De Millen v. McAlilley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Millen v. McAlilley, 27 S.C.L. 499 (S.C. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per

Gantt, J.

The report of the presiding judge in this case is so full and explicit, and his reasoning so satisfactory on the law giving construction to the deed, under which the plaintiff rests her claim, that it is deemed unnecessary to add any thing further in support of the views taken by him. It is therefore adopted as the opinion of the court, and the nonsuit as ordered cannot be set aside. The motion is therefore refused.

Richardson, Butler, Earle and Evans, JJ. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per

Gantt, J.

The report of the presiding judge in this case is so full and explicit, and his reasoning so satisfactory on the law giving construction to the deed, under which the plaintiff rests her claim, that it is deemed unnecessary to add any thing further in support of the views taken by him. It is therefore adopted as the opinion of the court, and the nonsuit as ordered cannot be set aside. The motion is therefore refused.

Richardson, Butler, Earle and Evans, JJ. concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 S.C.L. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-millen-v-mcalilley-sc-1836.