De Marios v. Hudspeth

305 U.S. 656, 59 S. Ct. 360
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 3, 1939
DocketNo. 533
StatusPublished

This text of 305 U.S. 656 (De Marios v. Hudspeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Marios v. Hudspeth, 305 U.S. 656, 59 S. Ct. 360 (1939).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit [657]*657Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.

Alfred De Marios, pro se. No appearance for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 U.S. 656, 59 S. Ct. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-marios-v-hudspeth-scotus-1939.