De Maria v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

90 F.2d 498, 19 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 872, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3866, 19 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 872
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1937·No. No. 8198·Published

Opinion

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

In our opinion herein we held that the decision in this case was controlled by what we said in Perata v. Commissioner, 89 F. (2d) 550, decided on the same day.

For reasons indicated in our order on rehearing of this date made in Perata v. Commissioner, 90 F.(2d) 498, wherein that case was remanded to the Board for decision under our holding therein, it is ordered that this case be remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals, with leave to consider such additional evidence as may be presented by the parties, and determine what, if any, is the taxpayer’s liability for the taxable year 1928.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Maria v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 90 F.2d 498, 19 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 872, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3866, 19 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 872 (9th Cir. 1937).

90 F.2d 498 (De Maria v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perata v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
90 F.2d 498 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)