De Marco v. McConnell
This text of 146 Misc. 9 (De Marco v. McConnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion is denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers. A default judgment will not be vacated, even though the judgment debtor is willing to pay costs and proposes an affidavit of merits. He must convince the court that he has either a good cause or defense as the case may be. This can only be done by a succint yet sufficient disclosure of his evidence. This court has frequently declared that default judgments are not a mere formality or idle gesture, and will not be disturbed as a matter of course. A study of the authorities, particularly Dana v. Thaw (56 Misc. 612), will teach movant's attorney how to proceed. Refusing to indulge in criticism, the court is constrained to remark that, while inexperience is humanely acceptable, it is. not a good excuse for failure to comply with express legal requirement.
Order signed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 Misc. 9, 260 N.Y.S. 540, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-marco-v-mcconnell-nysupct-1932.