De Marco v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
146 Misc. 117, 261 N.Y.S. 742, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1735
Opinion
It was a condition precedent to recovery that proof of death be filed with the defendant. Its admissions against interest are binding on the plaintiff; unless explained they are conclusive evidence of the truth of its contents. (Cirrincioni v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,223 App. Div. 461; Vecchio v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 224 id. 301.)
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Marco v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 146 Misc. 117, 261 N.Y.S. 742, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1735 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).
146 Misc. 117 (De Marco v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cirrincioni v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
223 A.D. 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)