De Macedo v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

De Macedo v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 208, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1059

United States Customs Court·Decided November 15, 1949·No. No. 53722; protests 144731-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

De Macedo v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 208, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1059 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

23 Cust. Ct. 208 (De Macedo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.