De Luca v. Village of Peekskill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Luca v. Village of Peekskill

250 A.D. 767, 293 N.Y.S. 658, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 767 (De Luca v. Village of Peekskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Luca v. Village of Peekskill, 250 A.D. 767, 293 N.Y.S. 658, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by Nancy De Luca, brought against several defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries, and by her husband, to recover for loss of services. The cause of action was that the village of Peekskill permitted a defective cover to be maintained over a water meter pit in one of its sidewalks. The complaint was dismissed as against all of the defendants except the village of Peekskill at the close of plaintiffs’ case; and at the close of the entire ease it was dismissed as against the village also. The theory upon which the dismissal was had was that the defect complained of was located in an area that had been taken over by the State and its agencies for the construction of a State parkway. The appeal is from so much of an order and judgment as dismisses the complaint as against the village. Judgment in so far as it dismisses the complaint as against the respondent, village of Peekskill, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissing the complaint is dismissed. No such order appears in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by Nancy De Luca, brought against several defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries, and by her husband, to recover for loss of services. The cause of action was that the village of Peekskill permitted a defective cover to be maintained over a water meter pit in one of its sidewalks. The complaint was dismissed as against all of the defendants except the village of Peekskill at the close of plaintiffs’ case; and at the close of the entire ease it was dismissed as against the village also. The theory upon which the dismissal was had was that the defect complained of was located in an area that had been taken over by the State and its agencies for the construction of a State parkway. The appeal is from so much of an order and judgment as dismisses the complaint as against the village. Judgment in so far as it dismisses the complaint as against the respondent, village of Peekskill, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissing the complaint is dismissed. No such order appears in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 767, 293 N.Y.S. 658, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-village-of-peekskill-nyappdiv-1937.