De Luca v. McNab

210 N.E.2d 643, 16 N.Y.2d 835, 263 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1166
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and the designating petition reinstated upon the ground that the petition sufficiently complied with section 135 of the Election Law (see Matter of Simpson v. Cohen, 275 N. Y. 642). The sheets as to each assembly district are consecutively numbered thus eliminating the opportunities for fraud which the requirement of consecutive numbering in section 135 of the Election Law was designed to prevent.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Reynolds

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Luca v. McNab, 210 N.E.2d 643, 16 N.Y.2d 835, 263 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1166 (N.Y. 1965).

210 N.E.2d 643 (De Luca v. McNab) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheehan v. Scaringe
121 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Contessa v. McCarthy
54 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)