De Luca v. McNab

210 N.E.2d 643, 16 N.Y.2d 835, 263 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1166
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 9, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 210 N.E.2d 643 (De Luca v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
De Luca v. McNab, 210 N.E.2d 643, 16 N.Y.2d 835, 263 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1166 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and the designating petition reinstated upon the ground that the petition sufficiently complied with section 135 of the Election Law (see Matter of Simpson v. Cohen, 275 N. Y. 642). The sheets as to each assembly district are consecutively numbered thus eliminating the opportunities for fraud which the requirement of consecutive numbering in section 135 of the Election Law was designed to prevent.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Reynolds

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheehan v. Scaringe
121 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Contessa v. McCarthy
54 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 N.E.2d 643, 16 N.Y.2d 835, 263 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-mcnab-ny-1965.