De Luca v. Kerwin

239 A.D. 850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The relationship of the witness to the plaintiff, the relation of the witness to the transactions out of which the general release sprang and the fact that the defendants are executors acting on behalf of a decedent are all special circumstances adequately justifying the examination of the witness before trial on behalf of the defendants. (Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 232 App. Div. 536; Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 id, 180; Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc., 217 id. 202.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Luca v. Kerwin, 239 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

239 A.D. 850 (De Luca v. Kerwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortner v. Bankers Security Life Insurance Society
17 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Lubitz v. Port of New York Authority
8 Misc. 2d 10 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.
273 A.D. 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.
190 Misc. 700 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Peyton v. Coulson
190 Misc. 754 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)