De Luca v. Kerwin
This text of 239 A.D. 850 (De Luca v. Kerwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The relationship of the witness to the plaintiff, the relation of the witness to the transactions out of which the general release sprang and the fact that the defendants are executors acting on behalf of a decedent are all special circumstances adequately justifying the examination of the witness before trial on behalf of the defendants. (Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 232 App. Div. 536; Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 id, 180; Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc., 217 id. 202.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-kerwin-nyappdiv-1933.