De Luca v. Ermer
This text of 1 A.D.2d 787 (De Luca v. Ermer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In action No. 1, respondent sought to recover money alleged to be due under a written agreement and to foreclose a mortgage on real property given as security for payment thereof. In action No. 2, appellant sought to rescind the agreement and the bond and mortgage executed simultaneously therewith. The actions were consolidated and tried before an Official Referee, who found in favor of respondent. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ. [See post, p. 838.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 787, 149 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-ermer-nyappdiv-1956.