De Luca v. De Luca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Luca v. De Luca

283 A.D. 1089, 132 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6405

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1089 (De Luca v. De Luca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Luca v. De Luca, 283 A.D. 1089, 132 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce, the defendant alleged as a defense that the parties are not husband and wife perforce the terms of a Connecticut decree of annulment or divorce granted in defendant’s favor. After trial, the defense was sustained and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. An appeal by the plaintiff, the alleged husband, from the judgment of dismissal is pending. Defendant moved for an allowance of expenses, payable by the plaintiff, to oppose the appeal from the judgment. The motion was denied. Order affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Leave is hereby granted to the defendant to file five typewritten copies of a brief in opposition to the plaintiff’s appeal and to serve one copy thereof on his attorney. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce, the defendant alleged as a defense that the parties are not husband and wife perforce the terms of a Connecticut decree of annulment or divorce granted in defendant’s favor. After trial, the defense was sustained and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. An appeal by the plaintiff, the alleged husband, from the judgment of dismissal is pending. Defendant moved for an allowance of expenses, payable by the plaintiff, to oppose the appeal from the judgment. The motion was denied. Order affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Leave is hereby granted to the defendant to file five typewritten copies of a brief in opposition to the plaintiff’s appeal and to serve one copy thereof on his attorney. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1089, 132 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-de-luca-nyappdiv-1954.