De Luca v. Coal Merchants Mutual Insurance
This text of 203 Misc. 261 (De Luca v. Coal Merchants Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the provisions of the policy there was no coverage for an assault committed by or at the direction of the insured. The assault was committed by the manager and president of the corporation acting in the line of his duty and in the interests of the corporation. The corporation is consequently liable for the assault. (McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co., 252 N. Y. 202.) The assault therefore may not be considered an accident within the meaning of clause 3 of the policy.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 Misc. 261, 59 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-luca-v-coal-merchants-mutual-insurance-nyappterm-1945.