De Lorenzo v. De Lorenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Lorenzo v. De Lorenzo

247 A.D.2d 285, 668 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1549

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1998·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered December 4, 1996, which awarded plaintiff various items of pendente lite relief claimed by defendant to be excessive and by plaintiff to be inadequate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award appears to reasonably balance plaintiffs needs and defendant’s ability to pay, and to be otherwise properly based on the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6). The appropriate remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered December 4, 1996, which awarded plaintiff various items of pendente lite relief claimed by defendant to be excessive and by plaintiff to be inadequate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award appears to reasonably balance plaintiffs needs and defendant’s ability to pay, and to be otherwise properly based on the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6). The appropriate remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

De Lorenzo v. De Lorenzo, 247 A.D.2d 285, 668 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

247 A.D.2d 285 (De Lorenzo v. De Lorenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related