De Lisle v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Lisle v. Rodriguez

7 A.D.2d 710, 180 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 710 (De Lisle v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Lisle v. Rodriguez, 7 A.D.2d 710, 180 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

On the record here presented the application for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice should have been granted. The physician’s affidavit indicated that this plaintiff, a 23-year-old woman, with a history of tuberculosis and diabetes, who was injured as a passenger in a two-ear collision, suffered fractures of the spine and clavicle and as a result of the trauma her diabetes became uncontrollable, with resultant failure of kidney function. He states his unequivocal belief that she will not survive for another two years. Order appealed from unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion, and motion granted, with costs. 'Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the record here presented the application for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice should have been granted. The physician’s affidavit indicated that this plaintiff, a 23-year-old woman, with a history of tuberculosis and diabetes, who was injured as a passenger in a two-ear collision, suffered fractures of the spine and clavicle and as a result of the trauma her diabetes became uncontrollable, with resultant failure of kidney function. He states his unequivocal belief that she will not survive for another two years. Order appealed from unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion, and motion granted, with costs. 'Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 710, 180 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-lisle-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-1958.