De Leyer v. . Britt

106 N.E. 57, 212 N.Y. 565, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 927
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 14, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties. to a question in difference may submit it to the court pursuant to section 1279 of the *566 Code of Civil Procedure if it might be the subject of an action. A mandamus proceeding is not an action, and the Appellate Division, therefore, did not have jurisdic-' tion to direct the issuance of a peremptory writ upon the submission of a controversy pursuant to said section. However, this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. We have examined the question involved because of its public importance and have reached the conclusion that the order should be reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below, and because the Appellate Division did not have jurisdiction to make it.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ., concur.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Leyer v. . Britt, 106 N.E. 57, 212 N.Y. 565, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 927 (N.Y. 1914).

106 N.E. 57 (De Leyer v. . Britt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adelphi Homes Co. v. State Tax Commission
216 A.D. 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Henning v. Camacho
181 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Murphy v. Britt
163 A.D. 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)