De Leon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

De Leon v. State

187 S.W. 485, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 407

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 1916·No. No. 4127·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of hog theft, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. The grounds of the motion for new trial, in the absence of the statement of facts, cannot be considered, and some of them set forth matters which could not be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions.

The judgment on the record as presented will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of hog theft, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. The grounds of the motion for new trial, in the absence of the statement of facts, cannot be considered, and some of them set forth matters which could not be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions.

The judgment on the record as presented will therefore be affirmed.

De Leon v. State, 187 S.W. 485, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 407 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

187 S.W. 485 (De Leon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.