de Lacour v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Beer ere eee as SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #. orescence sesso DR DATE FILED: August 07, 2023 ANNE DE LACOUR, ANDREA WRIGHT, and LOREE MORAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 16-CV-8364 (KMW) v. ORDER COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CoO., and TOM’S OF MAINE INC., Defendants.

KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: Defendants’ request to seal portions of their memorandum of law (ECF No. 301), to which Plaintiffs do not object, is GRANTED. After reviewing the proposed redactions (ECF No. 302), the Court finds that they are narrowly tailored to protect proprietary business information. The information Defendants seek to redact is similar in nature to the information the Court previously determined warranted sealing. (See ECF No. 259.) Accordingly, the Court concludes that the sensitivity of the information identified above outweighs the presumption of access. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Consistent with the Court’s prior determinations, the Court may reconsider its sealing determinations at any time, on notice to the parties, with respect to any and all sealed or redacted portions of Defendants’ materials.

The Clerk is respectfully directed to close the pending motion at ECF No. 301. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 07, 2023 /s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge