De La Torre v. Queija

702 So. 2d 293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13887, 1997 WL 757308
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1997·No. No. 97-1037·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lucio De La Torre (“former husband”) appeals an order entered after a default increasing child support in favor of appellee, Yakelin Queija (“former wife”). A review of the record reveals only one of the issues raised by former husband requires reversal. We agree that the default was properly entered as to the former husband’s liability for child support. See State, Dept. of Revenue on Behalf of Cordova v. Folks, 685 So.2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Arca v. Arca, 606 So.2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). However, the trial court did err in granting the former wife’s request for modification of support. This is so because the former husband was not allowed the opportunity to be heard or present evidence at the hearing as to the amount of his child support obligation. See Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla.1957); Manning v. Varges, 413 So.2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De La Torre v. Queija, 702 So. 2d 293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13887, 1997 WL 757308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 293 (De La Torre v. Queija) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leslie v. Gray-Leslie
187 So. 3d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Lopez v. Lopez
920 So. 2d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)