de la Torre v. Fulton

First Circuit

de la Torre v. Fulton

28 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 18, 1928

DocketNo. 2251

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 28 F.2d 1020 (de la Torre v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

de la Torre v. Fulton, 28 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577 (1st Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The following final decree entered: The decree of the District Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to enter an order dismissing the petition for want of juris[1021]*1021diction without costs; neither party recovers costs in this court. Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 S. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager, 203 U. S. 109, 27 S. Ct. 24, 51 L. Ed. 111; Barber v. Hetfield (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 245.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The following final decree entered: The decree of the District Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to enter an order dismissing the petition for want of juris[1021]*1021diction without costs; neither party recovers costs in this court. Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 S. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager, 203 U. S. 109, 27 S. Ct. 24, 51 L. Ed. 111; Barber v. Hetfield (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 245.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-torre-v-fulton-ca1-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack