de la Torre v. Fulton

First Circuit

de la Torre v. Fulton

28 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 18, 1928·No. No. 2251·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The following final decree entered: The decree of the District Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to enter an order dismissing the petition for want of juris[1021]*1021diction without costs; neither party recovers costs in this court. Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 S. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager, 203 U. S. 109, 27 S. Ct. 24, 51 L. Ed. 111; Barber v. Hetfield (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 245.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The following final decree entered: The decree of the District Court is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court, with directions to enter an order dismissing the petition for want of juris[1021]*1021diction without costs; neither party recovers costs in this court. Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 197 U. S. 536, 25 S. Ct. 538, 49 L. Ed. 870; Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager, 203 U. S. 109, 27 S. Ct. 24, 51 L. Ed. 111; Barber v. Hetfield (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 245.

de la Torre v. Fulton, 28 F.2d 1020, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2577 (1st Cir. 1928).

Pincite

28 F.2d 1020 (de la Torre v. Fulton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related