De La Torre v. Crete Carrier Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

De La Torre v. Crete Carrier Corp.

786 So. 2d 1202, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7480, 2001 WL 575055

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1417

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 786 So. 2d 1202 (De La Torre v. Crete Carrier Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De La Torre v. Crete Carrier Corp., 786 So. 2d 1202, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7480, 2001 WL 575055 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(“A motion for directed verdict should not be granted unless the trial court, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, determines that no reasonable jury could render a verdict for the non-moving party.”); Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 621 So.2d 710, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Jacobs v. Westgate, 766 So.2d 1175, 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (It is the function of the jury to weigh and evaluate the evidence.). In this case, there was conflicting evidence regarding skid marks which the jury could have resolved in favor of the defendant. Additionally, plaintiff testified that visibility was adequate and he could see where he was going. Thus, the jury could have concluded that he hit the truck because he was not paying attention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(“A motion for directed verdict should not be granted unless the trial court, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, determines that no reasonable jury could render a verdict for the non-moving party.”); Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 621 So.2d 710, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Jacobs v. Westgate, 766 So.2d 1175, 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (It is the function of the jury to weigh and evaluate the evidence.). In this case, there was conflicting evidence regarding skid marks which the jury could have resolved in favor of the defendant. Additionally, plaintiff testified that visibility was adequate and he could see where he was going. Thus, the jury could have concluded that he hit the truck because he was not paying attention.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

786 So. 2d 1202, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7480, 2001 WL 575055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-torre-v-crete-carrier-corp-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack