De La Hunt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

De La Hunt v. State

484 S.W.3d 349, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2015 WL 7253153

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102168

StatusPublished

This text of 484 S.W.3d 349 (De La Hunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De La Hunt v. State, 484 S.W.3d 349, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2015 WL 7253153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[350]*350sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[350]*350sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 S.W.3d 349, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2015 WL 7253153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-hunt-v-state-moctapp-2015.