De La Hunt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

De La Hunt v. State

484 S.W.3d 349, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2015 WL 7253153

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2015·No. No. ED 102168·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[350] sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[350] sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

De La Hunt v. State, 484 S.W.3d 349, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2015 WL 7253153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

484 S.W.3d 349 (De La Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.