De La Garza v. BCW TRUCKING, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 12, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

MARIA I. DE LA GARZA, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00066 § BCW TRUCKING, LLC, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING ORDER A/K/A MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On December 13, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued his Order (D.E. 16), which constitutes a memorandum and recommendation, recommending that this Court grant Defendants’ motion for leave to designate a responsible third party (D.E. 10). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 10), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for leave to designate a responsible third party (D.E. 10) is GRANTED. ORDERED on February 12, 2025. GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2