De La Garza, Eric
This text of De La Garza, Eric (De La Garza, Eric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,413-01
EX PARTE ERIC DE LA GARZA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2018-DCR-02374-I IN THE 445TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CAMERON COUNTY
Per curiam.
OR D ER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of
the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418
S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual
assault of a child, sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment and one count of indecency with a child
and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.
This Court remanded the application in October 2019. On September 21, 2020 this Court
received a motion to withdraw the application from Applicant.
This Court has held that requests for late-stage dismissals of habeas applications without prejudice, in general, are disfavored and will not be permitted. If, however, an applicant makes a showing of good
cause for a late-stage dismissal without prejudice, then permitting the entire process to begin anew is
appropriate. When this Court determines that a perceived deficiency in an existing habeas application could
be remedied by alternatives to a late-stage dismissal such as (1) the presentation of additional evidence,
(2) the filing of an amended or supplemental application raising new claims in the habeas court, or (3) a stay
of the proceedings for a reasonable period of time, then the applicant cannot show good cause for his
motion to dismiss without prejudice. Ex parte Speckman, 537 S.W.3rd 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017).
The trial court shall make findings as to whether it believes this motion to withdraw constitutes a
late-stage dismissal under Speckman and make a recommendation whether or not it believes the Court
should dismiss the habeas application pursuant to Applicant’s request.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within sixty days from the date of
this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and
conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,
objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from
this Court.
Filed: October 21, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
De La Garza, Eric, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-garza-eric-texcrimapp-2020.