De La Cruz v. Manhattan Parking Group LLC d/b/a Manhattan Parking Group

Opinion

] USDC SDNY | DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT } ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_12/11/2020__ CARLOS MARTIN DE LA CRUZ, on behalf — of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 20-CV-977 (BCM) -against- ORDER MANHATTAN PARKING GROUP LLC, et al., Defendants.

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. The parties having settled their dispute, including claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) brought by plaintiff Carlos Martin de la Cruz on behalf of a putative collective consisting of "all parking attendants, washers, cashiers, and other non-exempt laborers employed by Defendants," Compl. (Dkt. No. 1) {] 66, and claims under the New York Labor Law, brought by de la Cruz on behalf of a class comprising the same group of employees, id. 4 69, and having consented to the authority of the assigned magistrate judge for all remaining proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); It is hereby ORDERED that all deadlines previously set in this action are vacated. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit, no later than January 8, 2021, a motion for preliminary class certification and settlement approval, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), which shall also demonstrate why the proposed FLSA collective should be conditionally certified and why the settlement is fair and reasonable as required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). See Hernandez v. Between the Bread 55th Inc., 2020 WL 6157027, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2020) (internal quotation mark omitted) (noting that while "[t]he FLSA does not set forth a prescribed procedure for preliminary approval of a FLSA

collective," the parties "must satisfy the Court that their agreement is fair and reasonable" pursuant to Cheeks). Dated: New York, New York December 11, 2020 SO ORDERED. Vali BARBARA MOSES United States Magistrate Judge