De La Cruz v. Internal Revenue Service, Fresno Office

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: August 29, 2025
• Docket: 1:25-cv-00234
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RICK FABELA DE LA CRUZ , Case No. 1:25-cv-00234-KES-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 11 v. AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FRESNO OFFICE (ECF No. 11) 13 Defendant. 14

15 On August 28, 2025, Rick Fabela De La Cruz (“Plaintiff”) and United States of America, 16 on behalf of Internal Revenue Service1 (“Defendant”) filed a joint stipulation dismissing the 17 action with prejudice. (ECF No. 11). Further, the joint stipulation provided that each party bear 18 their own costs and expenses. (Id.). 19 Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated pursuant to 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 2 The action is dismissed with prejudice and without an award of 21 costs or attorneys’ fees. 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25

26 1 The real party in interest is the United States. The Internal Revenue Service is not a separately suable entity. See generally Balser v. DOJ, 327 F.3d 903, 907 (9th Cir. 2003). 27 2 The parties’ filing (ECF No. 11) refers to Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). However, Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is the provision that applies here because it addresses dismissal of an action based on “a 28 stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4} Dated: _ August 29, 2025 [Je hey — 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28