de la Concha v. Fordham University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

de la Concha v. Fordham University

261 A.D.2d 319, 690 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 7, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that it was filed while plaintiffs administrative complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights was still pending (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502 [a]; see, Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 210 AD2d 308). We have considered plaintiffs claims and find them to be unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 7, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that it was filed while plaintiffs administrative complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights was still pending (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502 [a]; see, Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 210 AD2d 308). We have considered plaintiffs claims and find them to be unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

de la Concha v. Fordham University, 261 A.D.2d 319, 690 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 319 (de la Concha v. Fordham University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related