de la Concha v. Fordham University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

de la Concha v. Fordham University

261 A.D.2d 319, 690 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 319 (de la Concha v. Fordham University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

de la Concha v. Fordham University, 261 A.D.2d 319, 690 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 7, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that it was filed while plaintiffs administrative complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights was still pending (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502 [a]; see, Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 210 AD2d 308). We have considered plaintiffs claims and find them to be unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 7, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that it was filed while plaintiffs administrative complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights was still pending (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502 [a]; see, Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 210 AD2d 308). We have considered plaintiffs claims and find them to be unpreserved and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 319, 690 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-la-concha-v-fordham-university-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack